Wikipedia article creation, done within Wikipedia's rules
Honest notability assessment and a disclosed, well-sourced draft through Wikipedia's review process.
A Wikipedia article can only exist if independent, reliable sources have covered the subject in depth. Where that coverage exists, we prepare a neutral, fully referenced draft and submit it through Wikipedia's review process with our paid role disclosed, as Wikipedia requires. Where it does not, we tell you honestly and recommend assets that will work better.
Who this is for
- Organisations and people with substantial independent press coverage
- Subjects already referenced across Wikipedia without their own article
- Organisations that need a neutral reference page for AI and knowledge panels
Who it is not for
- Subjects without independent, in-depth coverage
- Anyone wanting a promotional page or undisclosed paid editing
What the work involves
Notability assessment
An honest review of independent, reliable coverage against Wikipedia's notability guideline.
Source collection
The reliable, independent sources a neutral article would rely on.
Neutral draft
Written in Wikipedia's encyclopaedic style, with every claim referenced.
Disclosed submission
Submitted through Wikipedia's review process with paid contribution disclosed.
Post-publication care
Monitoring and disclosed talk-page requests for future updates.
How the work runs
- Search mappingWe identify the queries that matter and every result competing for them.
- Asset planWe decide which owned, earned and third-party assets can credibly outrank the problem.
- Build and publishProfiles, pages, articles and entity data are created or corrected, all truthful and attributable.
- Measure and adjustRankings are tracked weekly and the plan is adjusted to what the search engine rewards.
What you receive
- Notability report
- Source pack
- Neutral draft
- Disclosed submission
- Monitoring
What we cannot promise
- Volunteer reviewers decide whether an article is accepted. We cannot guarantee publication.
- Once published, the article belongs to Wikipedia and can be edited by anyone within its policies.
Frequently asked questions
How do I know if I am notable enough?
Wikipedia generally requires significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Press releases, your own site and paid features do not count.
What happens if the draft is declined?
Reviewers give reasons. Sometimes more coverage is needed first, which we will tell you plainly.
Will the article say only positive things?
No. Articles must be neutral and include significant, well-sourced criticism. Consider that before asking for one.
Why not create it without disclosure?
Undisclosed paid editing breaches Wikipedia's terms and often leads to deletion and public criticism.
How long does review take?
Wikipedia's review queue can take weeks or months.
Is my enquiry confidential?
Yes. You can make first contact without giving your name, we sign a non-disclosure agreement before you share case details, and case files are held in restricted, encrypted storage with access limited to your case team.
Related services
Often combined with
Wikipedia Editing and Monitoring
Correct, update and protect an existing Wikipedia article through disclosed, well-sourced requests.
Learn more RepairWikipedia Consulting
Honest notability advice and compliant edit requests for Wikipedia articles, with full disclosure.
Learn more RepairKnowledge Panel and Wikidata
Accurate knowledge panels and entity data, within Google's and Wikipedia's rules.
Learn moreStart with a confidential conversation
Tell us as much or as little as you like. We sign an NDA before you share case details, and we will tell you honestly whether we can help.